Neil Kozarsky Of T.h.e.m. Takes A Look At Packaging Professionals And The Social Order

Oh to be able to say doctor, lawyer...even Indian chief.industry. Instead of one voice, there are competing
But no. Each time we say the word "packaging" itvoices, each with its own message.
seems that most party guests sidestep toward thatYes, the Consumer Specialty Products Association
"must-have" appetizer across the room, or suddenly(CSPA) has really beefed up its image and
realize that their drinks need refilling.awareness efforts in the past years, but this
And yet we know all too well how essential our role isassociation only represents a tiny portion of the
in society. So who do we have to blame for this lackpackaging industry as a whole. Then there's the
of esteem? I think a large amount of the responsibilityInstitute of Packaging Professional (IoPP), the
rests on our own shoulders.Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Institute (PMMI),
Not that we should grab people by the arm and say,the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association
"Wait, wait...imagine a world without packaging. What(CTFA), the Western Aerosol Information Bureau
would a Kleenex be without a dispensing carton? How(WAIB), the Tube Council, the Society of Cosmetic
ready would Ready Whip be without the aerosolChemists (SCC), and on and on. Individually they do a
can?" What would a 6-Pack be without a 6-Pack?"great job of supporting membership interests. But
No, that would only make matters worse. What I amwhen it comes to the image of the entire industry, it
suggesting, however, is a collective look in the mirror,can be argued that the individualized messages do
and then a coming together of the disparate forcesmore harm than good.
within our industry that have been fragmented for tooIt's not too far flung to compare our image dilemma
many years.with that of the boxing world. For better or worse,
If the general public is to imagine a world withoutcompeting sanctioning bodies have just about dealt the
packaging, we have to imagine a packaging worldboxing industry a self-inflicted knock out. Instead of one
united in its efforts to educate the general public.heavy weight champion, there's one for every
Right now in the mind of the average consumer, thereorganization.
is no packaging industry. Many consumers merelyOur problem is not one of self-destruction, however. It's
believe that the product manufacturer is the onejust a matter of respect, and yes, ego. More than
responsible for the product's packaging. Many simplyanything else, it's a matter of pride.
think of brown bags and boxes when they hear theThe truth is, I am very, very proud of "what I do for a
word "packaging." Even those with a little moreliving." And most of my friends and associates in this
manufacturing worldliness only put us packagingindustry are equally proud. That's one reason why I still
professionals into four major commodity groups: glass,go to cocktail parties whenever the opportunity
metal, plastics and film.presents itself, and still look people right in the eye
One problem is the fact that there are no industrywhen I answer that self-defining question.
giants in packaging that serve to epitomize orSo let us imagine for a moment a world in which
represent the industry as a whole. Unlike aerospace,packaging has one voice. It is possible, you know. All it
computing or retail, there is no Boeing, or Dell, orwould take is the coming together of our current
Nordstom.industry factions, with a single-minded purpose. And it
The second major problem contributing to the lack ofwill happen some day. It's simply up to you and me to
understanding and respect is the fact that the industrymake it happen sooner rather than later.
makes no real effort to promote or explain itself. TheFor a downloadable version of this release, please
industry has no single voice.CLICK HERE
Sure we have trade associations. Good ones, too. But.
they each represent different segments of our